Summary
Ask ten people in digital assets what a “tokenization company” does and you will get ten answers, most of them about technology and few of them about the actual work: making a real-world asset legible, legal, and liquid as an on-chain security. Stobox has been doing that work since 2018 – 100+ clients, four continents, 20+ jurisdictions, $305M+ in assets structured and supported. This is the canonical explainer we point people to when they ask what Stobox is: the problem the company exists to solve, the three products that solve it, the methodology behind them, the pricing, and – just as deliberately – the list of things Stobox is not.
Key Takeaways
- Stobox is an infrastructure layer for tokenized capital markets, founded in 2018, with 100+ clients across four continents and 20+ jurisdictions and $305M+ in assets structured and supported.
- The stack has three layers that work in sequence: Intelligence (the verified record), Raisable (the regulated offering), Compass (the on-chain security and its lifecycle).
- The methodology is public: the eight-phase Stobox Tokenization Framework, published at stobox.io/framework.
- The commercial model is flat fees – published pricing, no percentage of the raise, no custody of client assets.
- Stobox is not a broker-dealer, not an exchange, not a fund, and not a marketing agency for token sales. Offerings run through licensed intermediaries.
The problem: capital markets run on unverified paperwork
Every capital-markets transaction – a raise, a listing, a loan, an acquisition – begins with the same ritual. The company assembles a data room. Lawyers restate what the documents say. Bankers restate what the lawyers said. The counterparty’s diligence team re-derives all of it from scratch, because no prior party’s conclusions transfer. A mid-size transaction can spend six figures and several months establishing facts that were already established, sometimes three or four times, by someone else.
The deeper problem is that none of this produces a durable asset. The day the deal closes, the data room goes stale. The next transaction starts the ritual again.
Tokenization is usually pitched as a solution to a different problem – liquidity, fractional ownership, settlement speed. Those are real. But in eight years of client work, the pattern Stobox saw repeatedly is that the binding constraint sits earlier: before an asset can be liquid, it has to be legible. A token that represents a poorly documented asset is a poorly documented asset with a ticker. The market prices the confusion, not the asset.
So the Stobox stack starts where the work actually starts: with the record.
Layer one: Stobox Intelligence – the verified record
Stobox Intelligence turns a company’s scattered documentation into one canonical, machine-readable record: ownership and structure, licences and registrations, financials, project data, contracts, compliance posture. Three properties make it a record rather than a folder:
- Source-linked. Every fact carries a link to the document it came from. When an investor, bank, exchange, or regulator asks a question, the record answers in the same words every time, with the source attached.
- Graded and dated. Facts carry verification status and freshness. A number that has not been re-confirmed shows its age instead of masquerading as current.
- Scored. The record is measured by the AXIS Readiness Score across seven pillars: Asset Quality, Legal & Compliance, Transparency, Technology & Protocol, Liquidity & Markets, Governance, and Risk Mitigation. The score tells the issuer exactly what stands between the current state and an investable one – and tells a counterparty how much of the diligence is already done.
The product view of the record covers 340+ canonical datapoints per company. The practical effect is that diligence stops being re-established by every party in every transaction. The first deal pays for the structure; every deal after it is faster and cheaper. For businesses that intend to do a series of projects – funds, platforms, developers, family offices – this compounding is the point.
Intelligence is also where the readiness conversation starts for a company that has not tokenized anything yet. A free self-assessment lives at stobox.io/readiness.
Layer two: Raisable – the regulated offering
A verified record is necessary but not sufficient. To raise against it, the asset needs an offering with a legal wrapper investors can actually buy.
Raisable builds that offering from the Intelligence record. The standard structure is a dual-track Regulation D 506(c) + Regulation S offering: the Reg D track for verified accredited investors in the United States, the Reg S track for investors outside it. The offering is routed to a licensed broker-dealer of record – Stobox does not sell securities and does not intermediate the transaction.
Two design decisions matter here:
- Flat fee, never a percentage. Stobox charges for the structuring and software work at published, fixed prices. The sponsor’s economics are not diluted by a success fee, and Stobox has no incentive to inflate the raise.
- The record is the offering’s foundation. Because the offering documents are built from the same source-linked record, the disclosure is consistent by construction. What the investor deck says, the data room says, and the on-chain passport will say, is one set of facts.
Layer three: Compass – the on-chain security and its lifecycle
Compass is where the asset becomes a live instrument. It issues the security as a permissioned token with an On-Chain Asset Passport – the machine-readable identity of the instrument, carrying what it is, who may hold it, and where its record lives – and then operates the lifecycle: investor onboarding and whitelisting, transfers with compliance enforced at the contract level, distributions, voting, and reporting.
Three properties define Compass:
- Non-custodial by design. Issuers and investors hold their own assets. Stobox operates software, not custody.
- Compliance in the contract, not in a promise. Transfer restrictions, eligibility, and jurisdiction rules execute inside the token’s own logic. Stobox works in the ERC-3643 ecosystem and is part of the uRWA (ERC-7943) contributor cohort, the emerging open standard for compliant real-world-asset tokens.
- White-label. An issuer can run the investor experience on its own domain and brand – its clients see its portal, powered by Stobox rails, with a manager console for the issuer’s team.
For issuers who want the branded fundraising experience without the full enterprise build, Compass also powers per-issuer offering portals on the issuer’s own domain, with the same non-custodial, compliance-first rails underneath.
The methodology: eight phases, published openly
The products execute a methodology Stobox has been refining since 2018 and publishes openly – the Stobox Tokenization Framework, authored by founder Gene Deyev:
- Strategy – what the tokenization is for, and whether it should happen at all.
- Asset Structuring – the legal vehicle that holds the asset and can carry a security.
- Tokenization Model – what the token represents: equity, debt, revenue share, fund units.
- Token Economics – supply, pricing, distributions, and holder rights that make sense for the asset.
- Issuing Framework – the regulatory path: exemptions, jurisdictions, investor classes.
- Legal Documentation – offering documents built on the verified record.
- Validation & Deployment – contracts, passport, and infrastructure, tested and live.
- STO Framework – the offering itself: onboarding, subscription, settlement, and what happens after.
Each phase is documented at stobox.io/framework. The framework is the reason client work looks repeatable rather than artisanal: the sequence is known, the deliverables are known, and the record produced along the way is an asset the client keeps.
Who uses Stobox
Eight years of client work sort into a few recurring archetypes:
- Asset owners and developers – real estate, energy, agriculture, natural resources – who need capital against assets that conventional markets price poorly or slowly.
- Funds and investment platforms that do many deals and want each one to make the next cheaper: one record structure, repeated raises, rolling tokenized exits instead of single illiquid holds.
- Operating businesses raising growth capital under Reg D/Reg S without giving up a percentage of the raise to intermediaries.
- Public and quasi-public programs – reconstruction, infrastructure, municipal pipelines – where verifiability is the precondition for any private capital arriving at all.
Geographically the work spans 20+ jurisdictions across four continents, with a US-first regulatory center of gravity: the company of record is Stobox Technologies Inc., and its founder took part in the SEC Crypto Task Force roundtable.
What it costs
Pricing is published, which is still unusual in this market:
- Compass Issuer Enterprise: $499 per month – the operating platform for a live issuer.
- Tokenization-ready structuring: from $14,500 one-time – the work that takes an asset from documents to an issuable structure.
- Custom engineering in defined blocks – quoted per block, only when the project genuinely needs custom work.
All fees are flat. Stobox never charges a percentage of the amount raised. If a vendor’s economics depend on the size of your raise, its incentives are not your incentives – this is one of the questions we suggest asking any tokenization vendor, including us.
What Stobox is not
The list of refusals defines the company as much as the list of products:
- Not a broker-dealer. Offerings are executed through licensed intermediaries. Stobox builds the machinery.
- Not an exchange and not a market-maker. Compass operates instruments; it does not run a trading venue and does not promise liquidity that does not exist.
- Not a custodian. Non-custodial architecture is a design commitment, not a tier.
- Not a fund and not an adviser. Stobox does not manage money and does not tell investors what to buy. Nothing Stobox publishes is investment advice.
- Not a hype shop. No token-sale marketing, no percentage-of-raise economics, no claims the record cannot support. The company’s own materials are held to the same evidence standard the Intelligence product enforces for clients.
A short history
Stobox’s timeline tracks the market’s own maturation, which is part of why the methodology feels earned rather than theoretical:
- 2018 – founded, in the first wave of security-token infrastructure, when the term “STO” still needed explaining in every meeting.
- 2019 – Gene Deyev co-authors one of the first books on security token offerings; the ideas that become the Tokenization Framework begin circulating as client methodology.
- 2019 to 2024 – the client-work years: 100+ engagements across real estate, energy, agriculture, funds, and operating businesses, in 20+ jurisdictions. Most of what the framework forbids today is a scar from something that went sideways in this period.
- 2024 to 2025 – the stack consolidates into its current three layers, with the verified record promoted from internal tooling to the product’s foundation: Intelligence first, everything else built on it.
- 2026 – the AXIS Readiness Score formalizes the seven-pillar assessment; Stobox joins the uRWA (ERC-7943) contributor cohort; the founder takes part in the SEC Crypto Task Force roundtable; Intelligence v1 ships as a product in September 2026.
The through-line: every layer of the stack was a service before it was software. The products encode what repeated client work proved necessary.
How an engagement actually runs
The framework describes phases; here is what a client experiences in practice.
Week one is about the record, not the token. The engagement starts by assembling the Intelligence record: corporate structure, ownership, licences, financials, the asset’s documentation. For most companies this surfaces a handful of gaps nobody had written down – an expired registration, an unsigned amendment, a cap-table inconsistency. Finding them at week one costs almost nothing; finding them in an investor’s diligence costs the deal’s momentum.
The AXIS score sets the work plan. The seven-pillar score converts “are we ready?” from a feeling into a list. Some clients clear it in weeks; some discover their real project is six months of legal structuring before any token makes sense. Both outcomes are wins – the second one especially, because it replaces an expensive false start with a plan.
Structuring runs against published prices. The tokenization-ready package (from $14,500) covers the path from documents to an issuable structure. Custom engineering, when a project genuinely needs it, is sold in defined blocks rather than open-ended billing.
Issuance and operations are a subscription, not a dependency. Once live on Compass ($499 per month for an enterprise issuer), the client operates: onboarding investors, running distributions, managing the register. The issuer owns its domain, its brand, and its keys. If Stobox disappeared tomorrow, the client’s securities would still be theirs, on-chain, with their record – non-custodial architecture is an exit right, not a slogan.
Where Stobox sits in the market
Three honest comparisons locate the company:
Against doing it yourself: a competent team can assemble contracts, counsel, and a cap-table tool and issue a token. What it cannot buy off the shelf is the record layer and the accumulated methodology – the two things that make the second and tenth deals cheaper than the first. DIY costs less on paper for one deal and more in practice for a program.
Against tokenization agencies: agencies sell a launch. The gravitational risk of that model is that everything ends at the token generation event, and the issuer is alone the day after. Stobox’s subscription model points the incentives the other way: the company earns by the issuer operating successfully for years, not by the launch happening once.
Against percentage-of-raise platforms: a vendor paid a cut of the raise is structurally motivated to maximize the raise, not the issuer’s outcome. Flat fees are less exciting and easier to trust. This is also why Stobox publishes prices – a market where every quote is bespoke is a market where nobody can compare anything.
None of this makes Stobox the right answer for every project. Assets that are better served by conventional financing, teams that want a marketing partner more than an infrastructure partner, or deals whose economics cannot absorb proper legal structuring should hear “no” early – and the readiness assessment exists partly to say it.
The company behind it
Stobox was founded in 2018 by Gene Deyev (Founder & CEO), author of the Tokenization Framework and co-author of one of the first books on security token offerings (2019). Ross Shemeliak (Co-Founder & COO) leads partnerships and operations. The team is 75+ people. The company of record is Stobox Technologies Inc. (Wyoming, USA).
The numbers that summarize eight years: 100+ clients · four continents · 20+ jurisdictions · $305M+ in assets structured and supported.
Where to start
- Read the methodology: stobox.io/framework
- Check your own asset with the free readiness score: stobox.io/readiness
- The 15 questions clients actually ask, answered: stobox.io/faq
- Talk to the team: stobox.io/contact
FAQ
What is Stobox in one sentence?
Stobox is an infrastructure layer for tokenized capital markets: compliance-first technology that lets a business organize its verified record, structure a regulated offering, and issue and operate a tokenized security on-chain, founded in 2018 and used by 100+ clients across four continents.
What are Stobox’s products?
Three layers that work in sequence. Stobox Intelligence builds the canonical, source-linked record of a company or asset and scores it with the AXIS Readiness Score. Raisable structures a dual-track Reg D 506(c) + Reg S offering from that record and routes it to a licensed broker-dealer. Compass issues and operates the tokenized security on-chain with an On-Chain Asset Passport, non-custodial by design.
Is Stobox a broker-dealer or a crypto exchange?
No. Stobox is a technology and infrastructure provider. Offerings built with Raisable are executed through licensed broker-dealers; Stobox charges flat fees for software and structuring work and never takes a percentage of the raise. Stobox does not take custody of client assets.
How much does Stobox cost?
Published pricing: Compass Issuer Enterprise is $499 per month, and tokenization-ready structuring starts at $14,500 one-time. Custom engineering is sold in defined blocks. All fees are flat – Stobox never charges a percentage of the amount raised.
What is the Stobox Tokenization Framework?
An eight-phase methodology covering the full path from idea to a live security token offering: Strategy, Asset Structuring, Tokenization Model, Token Economics, Issuing Framework, Legal Documentation, Validation & Deployment, and STO Framework. It is published openly at stobox.io/framework.
Which token standards does Stobox work with?
Stobox issues permissioned security tokens with compliance enforced at the contract level, works in the ERC-3643 ecosystem, and is part of the uRWA (ERC-7943) contributor cohort alongside other RWA infrastructure teams.
Stobox is a technology and infrastructure provider. Nothing in this article is legal, tax, or investment advice; regulatory questions should be validated with qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.