Tokenization, compared honestly
Concepts, regulations, and platforms side by side — including the comparisons where the honest answer is "not us." Written by an operator that has tokenized $300M+ since 2018.
Concepts & regulation
Security token vs utility token
Legal status, who can hold it, rights, transferability — the difference that decides which rules apply.
Read the comparison →Tokenization vs traditional fundraising
Where a tokenized raise actually beats the traditional route — and where it doesn't.
Read the comparison →Reg D vs Reg S vs Reg CF vs Reg A+
The four U.S. exemptions side by side: investors, caps, disclosure, and when each fits.
Read the comparison →ERC-3643 vs ERC-7943
The incumbent permissioned-token framework vs the lean 2026 standard — from a contributor to ERC-7943.
Read the comparison →STO vs ICO vs IEO
Same blockchain plumbing, opposite legal substance — the split that decided which one survived regulators.
Read the comparison →Tokenization vs IPO
The board-level question: public liquidity at 4–7% underwriting vs a flat-fee raise at the sizes public markets ignore.
Read the comparison →Platforms
Stobox vs Securitize
Institutional fund tokenization vs an operating system for private companies — different jobs, honestly compared.
Read the comparison →Stobox vs Tokeny
Two technology providers, two standards lineages (ERC-3643 vs ERC-7943), and very different customer journeys.
Read the comparison →Stobox vs Polymesh
A platform on general-purpose rails vs a purpose-built security-token blockchain — what the choice really trades off.
Read the comparison →Stobox vs Brickken
A no-code token minter with a 3% success fee vs a flat-fee operating system for the whole raise.
Read the comparison →Stobox vs DigiShares
A white-label real-estate portal assembled from add-ons vs one end-to-end journey with in-house specialists.
Read the comparison →Not sure any platform is the right question yet? Start withhow asset tokenization worksor score your company free with theAXIS Readiness Score.